AI 内容检测仪-诚实设计
将文字中的写作风格信号作为普通乐队来看待 — — 从来没有一个假的“ 82% AI ” 分数。 人工智能检测不可靠,我们向你展示了为什么没有假冒。
阅读此首: 人工写字检测不可靠,而且这一工具不会假称相反。 它报告符号信号( 生成文本中常见的模式) 而不是证据。 假正( 错误的肯定性) 常见: 谨慎、 正式、 编辑或非本地的写作经常会传递这些信号, 而一个坚定的作者可以回避这些信号。 绝不用这个作为指控的唯一理由。
信号意味着什么
音质测量,不是魔法
我们测量了人们所理解的特征—— 刑期长短不同多少, 模式上喜欢的语法, 反复的开口者—— 往往在人与人之间 和产生传教之间有差异。
乐队,绝不假作百分比
将写作风格转换成校准概率是没有诚实方法的。 所以我们要展示粗糙的乐团和单个信号, 并且让你来判断, 而不是一个发明的数字。
假阳性是常有的
任何探测器都认为正式、编辑、技术或非本地的书写“像AI ” 。 绝不要将乐队视为指控的证据或理由。
经常问到的问题
No AI detector is reliable, and we will not pretend this one is. It reports stylometric signals - patterns that are common in generated text, like unusually uniform sentence length - not proof. We show you the individual signals so you can judge them, and we show a band, never a fake precise percentage.
Because that number would be invented. There is no honest way to turn writing style into a calibrated probability that a specific passage was AI-written. Tools that show a confident percentage are giving you false precision - the same reason our plagiarism checker never claims a made-up accuracy figure.
Yes, and often. Careful, formal, or heavily-edited writing, technical documentation, and text by non-native English writers all tend to trip the same signals as generated text. Treat a "possibly AI" band as a prompt to look closer, never as an accusation.
The plagiarism checker compares your text against the live web to find copied passages. This tool looks only at writing style to flag patterns common in AI output - it does no web search. They answer different questions; use both, and trust neither as sole proof.
No. AI-signal analysis runs locally on our server in a single pass and the text is not saved to any report or database - it is only used to compute the signals shown back to you.