Brathadóir ábhar AI - macánta de réir dearaidh

Féach ar na comharthaí stíl scríbhneoireachta i do théacs mar bannaí plain - ní scór "82% AI" déanta suas.Tá AI a bhrath neamhiontaofa, agus léiríonn muid duit go díreach cén fáth in ionad ligean ar a mhalairt.

0 focail

    Rithfear an anailís go logánta in aon pas amháin - ní stórálfar do théacs. Ní dhéanann an uirlis seo cuardach ar an ngréasán; le haghaidh téacs cóipeáilte, bain úsáid as an seiceálaí plagiarism.

    Léigh seo ar dtús: AI-writing detection is not reliable, and this tool does not pretend otherwise. It reports stylometric signals - patterns common in generated text - not proof. False positives are common: careful, formal, edited, or non-native writing often trips these signals, and a determined author can evade them. Never use this as sole grounds for an accusation.

    Cad a chiallaíonn na comharthaí

    Stylometry, ní draíocht

    Tomhaiseann muid tréithe a thuigtear go maith - cé mhéad athraíonn fad abairte, frásaí is fearr le samhail, oscailt arís agus arís eile - a mbíonn claonadh acu a bheith difriúil idir prós daonna agus prós a ghintear.

    Bandaí, céatadáin bréige riamh

    Níl aon bhealach macánta ann chun stíl scríbhneoireachta a iompú ina dóchúlacht calabraithe.Mar sin, taispeánann muid banna garbh agus na comharthaí aonair, agus lig duit breithniú a dhéanamh - ní uimhir invented.

    Tá dearfach bréagach coitianta

    Is minic a bhíonn scríbhneoireacht fhoirmiúil, eagraithe, theicniúil nó neamh-dhúchas "AI-mhaith" le haon bhrathadóir.Ná déileáil le banna mar fhianaise nó mar fhorais le cúiseamh.

    A clean result is not proof of anything either

    Newer models write less like the early-2020s stereotype, and light editing removes most of what any style test can see - changing a few dashes and adding contractions is often enough. So this tool can miss generated text, and "no strong AI signals" does not mean a person wrote it. We would rather tell you that than sell you a number.

    Ceisteanna Coitianta

    No AI detector is reliable, and we will not pretend this one is. It reports stylometric signals - patterns that are common in generated text, like unusually uniform sentence length - not proof. We show you the individual signals so you can judge them, and we show a band, never a fake precise percentage.

    Because that number would be invented. There is no honest way to turn writing style into a calibrated probability that a specific passage was AI-written. Tools that show a confident percentage are giving you false precision - the same reason our plagiarism checker never claims a made-up accuracy figure.

    Yes, and often. Careful, formal, or heavily-edited writing, technical documentation, and text by non-native English writers all tend to trip the same signals as generated text. Treat a "possibly AI" band as a prompt to look closer, never as an accusation.

    The plagiarism checker compares your text against the live web to find copied passages. This tool looks only at writing style to flag patterns common in AI output - it does no web search. They answer different questions; use both, and trust neither as sole proof.

    No. AI-signal analysis runs locally on our server in a single pass and the text is not saved to any report or database - it is only used to compute the signals shown back to you.