[Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.]

[Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.]

0 словы

    [Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.] [Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.].

    [Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.] Выяўленне тэксту з дапамогай AI ненадзейнае, і гэтая праграма не патрабуе іншага. Яна паведамляе пра стыляметычныя сігналы - звычайныя ўзоры ў створаным тэксце - не доказ. Фальшывыя пазітыўныя вынікі часта сустракаюцца: асцярожнае, формальнае, рэдагаванае або ненацыянальнае напісанне часта падвяргае гэтыя сігналы небяспецы, і аўтар можа іх пазбегнуць. Ніколі не выкарыстоўвайце гэта як адзіную прычыну для абвінавачвання.

    [Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.]

    [Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.]

    [Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.]

    [Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.]

    [Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.]

    [Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.]

    [Translation temporarily unavailable. Please try again.]

    A clean result is not proof of anything either

    Newer models write less like the early-2020s stereotype, and light editing removes most of what any style test can see - changing a few dashes and adding contractions is often enough. So this tool can miss generated text, and "no strong AI signals" does not mean a person wrote it. We would rather tell you that than sell you a number.

    Частыя пытанні

    No AI detector is reliable, and we will not pretend this one is. It reports stylometric signals - patterns that are common in generated text, like unusually uniform sentence length - not proof. We show you the individual signals so you can judge them, and we show a band, never a fake precise percentage.

    Because that number would be invented. There is no honest way to turn writing style into a calibrated probability that a specific passage was AI-written. Tools that show a confident percentage are giving you false precision - the same reason our plagiarism checker never claims a made-up accuracy figure.

    Yes, and often. Careful, formal, or heavily-edited writing, technical documentation, and text by non-native English writers all tend to trip the same signals as generated text. Treat a "possibly AI" band as a prompt to look closer, never as an accusation.

    The plagiarism checker compares your text against the live web to find copied passages. This tool looks only at writing style to flag patterns common in AI output - it does no web search. They answer different questions; use both, and trust neither as sole proof.

    No. AI-signal analysis runs locally on our server in a single pass and the text is not saved to any report or database - it is only used to compute the signals shown back to you.